Systems were closed or isolated so that no parent or daughter carbon dating is not accurate were lost or added. Also, the Genesis flood would have greatly upset the carbon balance. K decay also forms plenty of beta radiation.
About Rhonda Ortega carbon dating is not accurate
Looks like you are using an old version of Internet Explorer - Please update your browser. If you already have an account, Sign in. Scientists use a technique called radiometric dating to estimate the ages of rocks, fossils, carbon dating is not accurate the earth. Many people have been led to believe that radiometric dating methods have proved the earth to be billions of years old. With our focus on one particular form of radiometric dating—carbon dating—we will see that carbon dating strongly supports a young earth. Note that, contrary to a popular misconception, carbon dating is not used to date rocks at millions of years old.
Radiocarbon dating can easily establish that humans have been on the earth for over twenty thousand years, at least twice as long as creationists are willing to allow. Therefore it should come as no surprise that creationists at the Institute for Creation Research ICR have been trying desperately to discredit this method for years. They have their work cut out for them, however, because radiocarbon C dating is one of the most reliable of all the radiometric dating methods. This article will answer several of the most common creationist attacks on carbon dating, using the question-answer format that has proved so useful to lecturers and debaters. Cosmic rays in the upper atmosphere are constantly converting the isotope nitrogen N into carbon C or radiocarbon.
How accurate are carbon-dating methods? All methods of radioactive dating rely on three assumptions that may not necessarily be true:. It is assumed that the rate of decay has remained constant over time. This assumption is backed by numerous scientific studies and is relatively sound. However, conditions may have been different in the past and could have influenced the rate of decay or formation of radioactive elements. Evolutionists assume that the rate of cosmic bombardment of the atmosphere has always remained constant and that the rate of decay has remained constant.
See this page in: HungarianRussianSpanish. P eople who ask about carbon 14 C dating usually want carbon dating is not accurate know about the radiometric  dating methods that are claimed to give millions and billions of years—carbon dating can only give thousands of years. People wonder how millions of years could be squeezed into the biblical account of history.
I asked several people who know about this field. Their responses are numbered below. C14 dating is very accurate for wood used up to about 4, years ago. This is only because it is well calibrated with objects of known age. This standard content of C14 can then be used for wood not associated with a historically documented date.